Volume 3, Special Issue: Metatheatrical Tendencies in Harold Pinter’s The Lover

Author

Asst. Prof. May Ahmed Majeed

Keywords

Metatheater, illusion, reality, Pinter

Abstract

The term metatheater  is coined by Lionel Abel in 1963 which refers to theater about theater. It draws  attention to the  distinction between the fiction of the play and the  reality of performance. A play refers to itself as a play to encourage the audience to perceive it in two ways; as a pretended reality and as dramatic artifice.  Metatheater also appears in both  comedy and tragedy, where the audience can laugh and empathize at the same time.  The paradoxical perspective of   fake  and real promoting audience instability and this is the role of metatheater.   It   is an artistic way to examine the interaction between illusion and reality. There is a need to represent reality through artificiality   to provide an insight to see the truth of human mind and  to illuminate the individual perspective. Within this study metatheater considered as a tendency rather than a technique. It examines  the conflict between illusion and reality in Harold Pinter’s The Lover and focuses  on play within the play device. It shows that illusion and reality is the bases of  both the subject matter and the dramatic technique of the plays of Harold Pinter who is a revolutionary British playwright.   It shows how the  play employs  the standard Pinter’s technique of mixing  illusion and reality, presenting a comedy  in modern absurd way.   Metatheatrical tendencies in The Lover traces how people lost simplicity and spontaneity of  communication and unable express their real beings.

References

Abel, Lionel. (1963). Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form .New York: Hill and Wang.
Billington, Michael. (1996). Harold Pinter. London: Faber & Faber.

Borah, Rashmi. (2041). “Reading Harold Pinter‟s “The Lover” as a Schizophrenia play”. International Journal of Science, Engi-neering and Management (IJSEM) Vol 3, Issue 5, May.

Cahn, Victor. (1993). Gender and Power in the Plays of Harold Pinter. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Digeatani, John Louis. Stages of Struggle: Modern Playwrights and Their Psychological Inspirations. London: McFarland & Company Inc.

Fischer, Gerhard, etal. 2007. The Play within the Play: The Performance of Met- theatre and Self-reflection. New York: Rodopi.

Freud, S. (1953) The Interpretation of Dreams. London: Hogarth Press.

Krüger, Johanna Alida. (2014). The Actual versus the Fictional in Be-trayal, The Real Thing and Closer. University of South Afri-ca. Pretoria. Web. Accessed 20 Oct 2017.

Manscwicz, A. (2001). Metatheatre(s) in Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, The Real Inspector Hound and Harold Pinter’s The Lover: Friendly Metaphors: Essays on Linguistics, Literature and Culture in Honour. Germany: Pe-ter Lang.

Pinter, Harold. (1965). The Lover. New York: Dramatists Play Service Inc.

Pinter, Harold. (1972). “Introduction”, Pinter: A Collection of Critical Essays. Arthur Ganz, ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Pinter, Harold. (1999). Plays One. London: Faber & Faber.

Roby, Peter ed. 2009. The Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sykes, Alrene. (1970). Harold Pinter. New York: Humanities Press.

Download PDF
DOI